【カッコいい】New 2021 Omega Speedmaster Professional 3861 Review

コメント

1. Alexander V. より:

   2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

   That bracelet is absolute junk! It’s looks cheap and toyish and that taper is so feminine. No way I would buy that.

   返信
2. Rokket designer より:

   2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

   BEWARE, OMEGA PRODUCTION ERROR – All Speedmasters with cal.1861 or cal.1863 movement (manual wound) paired with 5th of a second markers on dial (seconds divided into 5 parts) or paired with 4th of a second markers, and all with cal.3220 movement (automatic) paired with 5th-second markers on dial, have INACCURATE READING of the chronograph hand due to NO FIT between dial-markers of fractions-of-a-second and the movement’s beat-frequency per second. Cal.1861/1863 beat at 6 vibrations per second (6VPS) and require a 3rd or 6th of a second per marker between the seconds; the cal.3220 beats at 8 VPS and require a half or a 4th or 8th of a second between the markers.
   This affects Speedmasters with reference no. 311.10.39.30; 311.33.42.30; 311.30.42.30.01; 3590.50; 3572.50 et cetera (if they have 5th of a second markers paired with a 6 BPS movement – cal.1861 or 1863); 311.30.42.30.03 (a 4th of a second per marker); and it affects Speedmasters with ref. no. 3510.50; 3510.12; 3520.50; 2598.80 etc. (if they have 5th of a second markers, i.e. each second divided into 5 fractions of a second, paired with a 6 beats per second movement – cal.3220 or 1151 etc.).

   Incidentally, those with ref. no. 311.32.40.30.01.005; 311.30.42.30.01.004; 311.33.40.30.02.001; percent 311.32.42.30.04.003; 522.30.42.30.04.001 (cal.1861); 311.30.42.30.99.002 (cal.1863); 3876.50.31 (cal.1866) that have a 1/3 of a second per marker (each second divided into 3 parts, i.e. 2 sub-markers between each marker of a full second), are correct.

   Even Tudor had the same production error/design flaw, on all their Valj.-based 28,800 BPH (8 BPS) movement equipped Heritage chronographs, having 4 dividers between each full second marker, making it a 5th of a second per marker, with a CHRONO-hand that jerks forward 6 times per second and always miss the first and the third quarter-second-marker). Only now do we see it corrected. And only now have we recently seen Omega NOT cheating in this regard, more than 50 years after they stopped making their 18,000 BPH (5 BPS) movement, cal.321. They even cheated NASA, in the 1960s, equipping the astronauts with a 6 jerks per second chronograph hand over a dial with only 5 fraction-of-a-second markers. How lame and criminal isn’t that ?

   Even their so-called 1957 reissue has a 21,600 BPH (6 BPS) movement paired with each second divided into 5 fractions on the dial. Right, a CURRENTLY ONGOING mass sale of factory error/design flaw equipped CRAP, useless for what it is marketed as, a precision instrument for accurate split second timing. Criminal.

   返信
3. Phil O より:

   2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

   Have you taken any links out of the bracelet yourself? If you have then you might see why it feels so cheap. Idk why Omega uses two tiny screws for each end of the links with a little metal bar sitting in between the screws to hold the links together. They should do what Rolex does and uses one solid screw that goes in one end and screws into the opposite end.

   返信
4. Jeff Renteria より:

   2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

   Least to fav out of the ones you have shown here

   返信
5. Johnfsu より:

   2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

   Great review and congrats on the purchase! How is it running? One minor critique, shoot wide and not portrait mode.

   返信
6. Joe Thornton より:

   2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

   I just picked mine up. I got the Sapphire Sandwich. A damn dream come true. Perfect compliment to my Seamaster.

   返信
7. null w より:

   2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

   what is the width of the clasp?

   返信
8. 1977JohnBoy より:

   2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

   don’t think many realise it has travel case inside, think that makes up for the straps/tool/paper weight.

   返信
9. Tommyredcat Racing より:

   2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

   Lots of people saying the edges on the head of this new model are sharp and slightly unfinished, you didn’t mention this so guessing yours was all good..

   返信
10. Chris Blankner より:

    2021年5月4日 9:48 PM

    How are the edges? Are they sharp? Newest criticism

    返信